Windsurf
AI-first IDE forked from VS Code, built around the Cascade agent for autonomous multi-file edits. The Cursor competitor that ate Codeium's old autocomplete product.
Overview
Windsurf is a VS Code fork rebuilt around AI-first workflows, with Cascade as its core agent. Cascade handles autonomous multi-file edits — you describe what you want, review diffs, and approve changes across your codebase without manually jumping between files. It's the same category as Cursor's Composer, and that's the comparison you'll be making if you're evaluating both. You get tab completion via Supercomplete, which tries to predict your next edit across files rather than just autocompleting the current line. Model access includes Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, and Codeium's own models. Because it's a VS Code fork, your extensions, themes, and keybindings transfer without reconfiguration. The company history is worth knowing: Codeium killed their standalone autocomplete product to go all-in on Windsurf, then got acquired by OpenAI in 2024, then sold to Google in 2025. That's an unusual amount of ownership churn for a tool you'd be building a daily workflow around. The product itself has been stable through the transitions, but it's a legitimate thing to factor in if you care about long-term continuity.
- Cascade agent autonomously edits across multiple files — you review diffs before changes apply.
- Supercomplete predicts your next edit across files, not just the next token on the current line.
- Inline chat and natural-language edits without leaving the editor or switching context.
- Access Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, and Codeium's own models from a single interface.
- VS Code fork means your existing extensions, keybindings, and settings carry over on day one.
- Teams tier includes centralized billing, usage controls, and shared model access.
What stands out
- Closest feature-for-feature Cursor alternative — if you've used Cursor's Composer, Cascade will feel immediately familiar.
- VS Code compatibility lowers the switching cost significantly compared to fully custom editors.
- Freemium tier lets you evaluate Cascade and Supercomplete before paying anything.
- Multi-model access without managing separate API keys or subscriptions.
- Supercomplete's cross-file prediction is genuinely differentiated from standard line-level autocomplete.
Where it falls short
- Three ownership changes in roughly two years — Codeium → OpenAI → Google — is real uncertainty for a core dev tool.
- Pro tier at $15/mo is comparable to Cursor; there's no clear pricing win if cost is your deciding factor.
- Teams pricing at $35/user/mo adds up fast for larger engineering orgs.
- Being a VS Code fork means you inherit VS Code's limitations, not a ground-up rethink of the editor.
Who it's for
- Cursor users who want to evaluate the closest direct alternative before committing to a subscription.
- Professional developers who live in VS Code and want AI agent features without migrating to a new editor paradigm.
- Teams evaluating AI-first IDEs at the org level, where per-seat pricing and admin controls matter.
- Developers who want multi-model access — Claude, GPT, Gemini — from a single editor without API key juggling.
- Engineers skeptical of GitHub Copilot's depth who want autonomous multi-file editing, not just autocomplete.
Pricing
What we hold on record for Windsurf.
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Plan details
- Free (limited) / Pro $15/mo / Teams $35/user/mo / Enterprise custom
Advertised prices often assume annual billing — The Annual-Billing Illusion , our study of 150 tools.
Our take
Windsurf is the fork that emerged from Codeium's pivot — Cascade agent, Supercomplete, very competitive Pro pricing at $15/mo, now owned by Google.
— Toolhunter editors , from Windsurf vs Cursor
Frequently asked questions
Is Windsurf free?
There's a free tier. Paid upgrades are available.
How much does Windsurf cost?
Free (limited) / Pro $15/mo / Teams $35/user/mo / Enterprise custom.
What is Windsurf used for?
Cursor, but Google owns it now. It's listed under Code Assistants in our directory.
Keep comparing
Compare Windsurf with…
Picking between Windsurf and one of its peers? See a side-by-side breakdown.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your experience.
More tools like this
All Code Assistants tools →Looking for AI tools similar to Windsurf? These are the closest picks in our index.
Alibaba's Qwen AI — a free consumer chat app plus a family of open-weight models (chat, coding, multimodal, agentic) offered via API at a fraction of frontier-model prices.
Alibaba's Qwen AI — a free consumer chat app plus a family of open-weight models (chat, coding, multimodal, agentic) offered via API at a fraction of frontier-model prices.
Cognition's autonomous AI software engineer that takes a ticket and writes, tests, and ships code on its own, running in its own cloud dev environment with terminal, editor, and browser.
Moonshot AI's chatbot built for long-context reasoning, agentic coding, and deep research, powered by the open-weight Kimi K2 models with very large context windows.
Mistral's AI assistant (now branded Vibe) built on frontier open-weight models, with web search, deep research, code execution, image generation, and a privacy-first no-telemetry mode.
Chinese open-weight frontier model. V3 and R1 (reasoning) at ~10-30x cheaper API rates than GPT or Claude. The model that briefly tanked NVIDIA's stock in Jan 2026.
Open-source AI coding agent that runs as a VS Code extension (not a fork). Bring-your-own-API-key — pay only LLM costs, no Cline subscription.
AI app builder acquired by Wix for $80M in 2024. Build full-stack apps with database, auth, and hosting from plain English prompts — no external services needed.
AI-powered full-stack app builder. Describe what you want, get working frontend + backend + database + auth + deployment. $200M ARR, $6.6B valuation as of Dec 2025.